Fetal development is a complex process, which depends on a variety of growth factors such as availability of nutrients and oxygen for the fetus. The placenta appears as the source of oxygen and nutrients for the fetus, therefore, it plays a central role in fetal growth. Placental processes depend on the size, morphology, blood flow, and transporter abundance of the placenta (1-4).
In terms of placental morphology, the shape of the chorionic plate of the human placenta is commonly round, with the umbilical cord roughly inserted at the center (4, 5). However, Salafia (2010) states that very few placentas appear truly round with a centrally inserted umbilical cord.
The placental shape has been commonly described as round, oval, bi- or multi-lobate, or otherwise irregular (6). Benirschke suggests that the mechanism by which a non-round placenta develops is unclear. However, the
findings support the notion of a secondary conversion from more normal placentation (7).
In less than 1 in 6,000 deliveries, the placenta is annular in shape, and sometimes a complete ring of the placental tissue is present. However, due to tissue atrophy in a portion of the ring, a horseshoe-shaped placenta becomes more common (Figures 1 & 2) (5).
Several studies have shown that abnormal placental growth is associated with adverse gestational outcomes, and could result in an impaired delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the fetus, thus leading to an abnormal fetal development (8, 11).
Horseshoe-shaped placenta, as a variant of ring-shaped placenta, appears to be associated with a greater likelihood of ante- and post-partum bleeding and fetal growth restriction (5).
This shape of placenta is so rare that there is no sufficient evidence to explain its
correlation with adverse gestational outcomes. Therefore, considering the importance of this type of placenta, due to its association with some fetal and maternal complications, in this report, we aimed to address a rare case of horseshoe-shaped placenta.
Herein, we report a horseshoe-shaped placenta with a non-central umbilical cord insertion (marginal cord). The subject was a 35 year-old gravida 2, para 1 woman, who was referred to the labour and delivery unit of Shohada Hospital in Quchan, Iran.
The subject had labor pain at 34 weeks’ gestation and gave birth to a liveborn female infant, with cephalic presentation after two hours of labor, followed by a preterm vaginal delivery. The amniotic fluid was meconium-stained, and one- and five-minute APGAR scores were 6 and 8, respectively.
On first vaginal examination, the cervix was 70% effaced and 4 cm dilated, and the patient had no signs of fever, bleeding, infection, or history of medical complications throughout or before the pregnancy. The course of pregnancy was uneventful, and the subject received antenatal care in an outpatient unit.
In this report, by considering a possible relationship between the horseshoe-shaped placenta and preterm labor, an association between placental abnormality and other unidentified consequences can be suggested; however, the presence of such association has not been confirmed in the literature review.
Unfortunately, placental pathology is rarely included in the training of either obstetricians or
pathologists. As a result, the potential benefits of routine placental examination are in question. Salafia (1990) states that these benefits include the clarification of the causes of many adverse gestational outcomes, the improvement of future pregnancy risk assessments, and ascertainment of neonatal risk factors for long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae (12).
Penfold et al. (1979) demonstrated that there was no evidence regarding the association between fetal growth (its condition at birth) and cord eccentricity, placental shape and thickness, or the dimensions of the cord (13).
On the other hand, Yampolsky et al. (2009) showed that placental proportions, such as deviations of the placental shape from round and the relative thickness of the placenta modify placental functional efficiency, and in particular, explain some possible birth weight ranges in a normal population delivered from similar placental weights (4). Additionally, they indicated that the placenta with a displaced cord shows a markedly reduced transport efficiency, reflected in a larger value of β-HCG, and hence a smaller birth weight for a given placental weight (4).
Similarly, in our case, the displaced cord and placental shape might be caused by preterm labor due to reduced transport efficiency. In addition, according to Alwasel’s findings (2013), tissue along the breadth of the placental surface may be more important than the tissue along the length in the transfer of nutrients from the mother to the fetus. In our case, the breadth of the placental surface was less than its length.
Costa et al. (2008) indicated that the determination of uterine artery Doppler and placental morphology (its shape and texture) with ultrasound at 18-23 weeks of gestation could predict adverse perinatal outcomes. In their study, the placental shape was considered abnormal when depicting the following characteristics: placental length less than 10 cm, thickness more than 4 cm, or the length/thickness ratio less than 2.0 during the second trimester (15).