Document Type : Systematic Review
Authors
1 a) Assistant Professor in Reproductive Health, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran b) Senior Research Fellow, Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
2 MSc in Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Doctor of General Medicine, Yasoj University of Medical Sciences, Yasoj, Iran
4 PhD Student in Reproductive Health, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5 MSc of Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
Introduction
Primary dysmenorrhea usually occurs within 1-2 years after menarche (1-2). The prevalence of this problem is about 71% in Iran (3-5). Dysmenorrhea is one of the main factors affecting the quality of life and social activities (6-7). Heavy menstrual bleeding is the other common gynecological problem experienced by 30% of childbearing age women (8-9).
The common treatment methods include combined estrogen-progesterone contraceptives or progestin alone (10-11). Side effects of medical treatments include gastrointestinal disorders such as nausea and vomiting, kidney disorders, stomach ulcers, dizziness, tinnitus, allergic reactions, blood and liver complications, bleeding and spotting (12-14).
Herbs are among the basic treatment methods and are significantly more superior to chemical drugs due to higher acceptability and less complications (15-16). Thyme, fennel, marigold, anethum graveolens, saffron, teucrium polium, bromelain, fenugreek, rosemary are effective plants for dysmenorrhea and menstrual disorders, but due to the small number of studies and poor methodology, definitive conclusions about the effect of these plants are not reported (17-23). Millefolium Achillea, commonly known as yarrow, is one of the native plants of Iran, which is used as one of the herbal remedies for dysmenorrhea (24). Achillea millefolium inhibits the cyclooxygenase enzyme and can be effective as an antiprostaglandin drug to improve primary dysmenorrhea. Achillea millefolium also inhibits smooth muscle contraction by closing calcium channels, so it can have an antispasmodic effect on uterine smooth muscle (25). Achillea millefolium is used in the treatment of blood clotting and blood coagulation (24, 28). In one study, the reduction of dysmenorrhea severity was greater in the Achillea millefolium and mefenamic acid groups compared with the placebo and mefenamic acid groups. The duration of pain was reduced in both groups, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of reducing the duration of pain (29). In another study with aimed to compare the impact of chamomile and Achillea millefolium capsules on the intensity of primary dysmenorrhea, both Achillea millefolium and chamomile capsules reduced pain intensity, but reduced pain intensity was greater in the group of Achillea millefolium capsules with their long-term sedative properties (30). In other study, the amount and duration of menstrual bleeding were significantly reduced before and after treatment in both Achillea millefolium and mefenamic acid groups, which was significantly higher in Achillea millefolium group compared to the control group (31). Also, another study reported that the amount and duration of menstrual bleeding were significantly reduced before and after treatment in both Achillea millefolium and mefenamic acid groups, which was more significant in the Achillea millefolium group compared to the control group. Although the amount and duration of menstrual bleeding increased during the follow-up period after treatment in both groups, it was less than the pre-intervention period. Drowsiness and gastrointestinal complications were among the reported side effects after consumption of Achillea millefolium (32).
Since no systematic review has been conducted to gather the information on the impact of Achillea millefolium on primary dysmenorrhea , menstrual bleeding volume and additional side effects of common drugs: uncertainty has remained regarding the efficacy of Achillea millefolium.Further studies are needed to address this uncertainly.Although, several studies have investigated the effects of Achillea millefolium on dysmenorrhea and menstrual bleeding, a conclusive decision regarding its use has not been reached., Therefore this present review systematically evaluated and summarized the results of clinical trials focusing on the impact of Achillea millefolium on primary dysmenorrhea and menstrual bleeding.
Materials and Methods
The current study was performed based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA 2020 checklist). In this study, international databases including Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science direct, Cochrane databases, Google Scholar and Research Proposal Information System (RPIS; https://rpis.research.ac.ir/) were searched to access the related articles. Search strategies were developed using Medical subject headings (MeSH) and synonyms. The searches were conducted using the English keywords and Persian equivalents as followsing: chilleas OR Yarrows* OR Achillea millefolium OR Achillea millefoliums* OR millefolium OR Achillea AND dysmenorrhea OR menstruation disturbances OR menstruation disorders OR menstrual disorder OR pelvic pain OR painful menstruation OR painful period OR period pain OR primary dysmenorrhea AND Heavy Menstrual Bleeding OR Menorrhagia OR Menstrual Bleeding OR Hypermenorrhea OR Heavy Periods OR Heavy Period AND randomized clinical trial. The search terms for specific oils were used after pilot screening the databases (lavender and rose). The references were assessed manually to access all related articles.
The research question was based on Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO). The study population included women with moderate to severe dysmenorrhea OR menorrhagia with a score of 100 in the Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBLAC). The women were non-smoker or non-alcoholic, with no cervical secretions, no stressful events, no history of uterine disorders (fibroids, duodenal ulcers, polyps, endometrial hypertrophy and endometriosis) and ovarian disorders (ovarian cysts and polycystic ovaries). Interventions of the including trials were oral administration of Achillea millefoliums, with other modern dosage forms. The dosage and treatment course were not limited. The control group included placebo, blank control, and conventional medicine (such as NSAIDs). The outcomes were pain and menstrual bleeding, a reduction in menstrual pain and bleeding which occurs only during the intervention or as a result of the intervention.
Three reviewers evaluated all the articles, and the data were based on a pre-designed table (Table 1). First, one researcher read the different sections of the article separately and noted her impression in each section. Then, the second researcher assessed the articles in the same way and recorded the results in a table. If there was disagreement between the two researchers, the third researcher (first author as a project manager) reviewed each case independently.
Data which extracted fro the articles included the first author’s name, year of publication, place of study, type of study, variables, research sample, intervention and control group, complications, results, and tools which were cited in the results of the article (Table 1). Any discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved through discussion until consensus was achieved.
The Cochrane Risk of bias tool was applied to evaluate the articles' quality and reviewed the studies in terms of selection bias (random sequence generation and allocation concealment), implementation (blinding participants and evaluators), diagnosis (statistical analyst blinding), sample dropout (leaving the study after randomization), and reporting (selective outcome report) (32). Procedures of study selection and the reasons for their exclusion were represented in the flowchart (Figure 1).
Method of synthesis of data was qualitative. This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences with the code of (IR.MUMS.NURSE.REC.1400.082).
Results
Literature search and study characteristics
A total of 80 articles found in the initial search; 7 were reviewed that one study was omitted due to poor methodology (method was pre-test and post-test and not stating the method of sampling and randomization) (32). Finally, 6 studies (number of participants= 476) were systematically reviewed (Figure 1).
The characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review study were given in Table 1. Among 6 reviewed studies, 3 studies evaluated the impact of Achillea millefolium on primary dysmenorrhea (17,29,33), 2 studies evaluated the effect of Achillea millefolium on menorrhagia (30-31) and one study assessed the effect of Achillea millefolium on both primary dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia (34). The minimum and maximum sample sizes were 50 and 120, respectively. Subjects in the control group received mefenamic acid capsules and starch-containing capsules in three studies (17, 30-31), and in one study received tea bags similar to the intervention group containing 4 grams of placebo (33). The intervention group consumed Achillea millefolium capsules (17,29-34) in 5 studies and tea bags containing Achillea millefolium (33) in one study. In 5 studies, individuals were studied for 2 cycles (17,29-33) and in one study, for three menstrual cycles (34). In the studies, daily dose of Achillea millefolium was 150 mg to 10 g, which was mostly consumed every 8 hours by research units.
In all articles which evaluated the impact of Achillea millefolium on primary dysmenorrhea, the Visual Scale (VAS) tool was used to measure pain (17,29, 34).
Jenabi et al(2015) (33) reported moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (score greater than 3 based on pain scale) and Maliki et al. (2009) (34) reported moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (score greater than 5 based on pain scale). The results of all these studies show that the reduction in the severity of dysmenorrhea was greater in the Achillea millefolium group compared to the control group.
Characteristics of the Included Studies Ebrahimi et al. (2017) (17) and Radfar et al. (2018) (29) reported moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (score 4-10 based on pain scale). Khademi et al. (2019) (30) used the Pictorial menstrual bleeding Assessment Chart (PBLAC) visual tool to assess menstrual bleeding. Ebrahimi et al. (2020) (31) used the PBLAC visual chart to assess menstrual bleeding and the participants were women with regular menstrual and those with menorrhagia with a score of 100 or more determined based on a visual chart. According to the results, the amount and duration of menstrual bleeding were significantly reduced before and after treatment in both groups, which was significantly higher in the Achillea millefolium group compared to the control group.
Complications reported by participants in the two study groups after receiving the intervention included gastrointestinal intolerance (17-31), gastric irritation (30), and headache, insomnia, and drowsiness (31).
Risk of bias analysis
The risk of bias was systematically evaluated by the Cochrane Risk of bias tool. In terms of random sequence bias, 5 studies were considered less bias due to the use of a random number table (17,29-33) and one study was considered to be vague due to not explaining the randomization method (34). Five studies were considered to have low bias due to the use of random sequence generation software to assign individuals to the control and intervention groups. In terms of allocation concealment bias, 3 studies had low bias due to the use of computer software (17, 29-31, 33).
In terms of performance bias, 3 studies were performed by double blind method (29, 33-34) and 3 studies were performed by triple blind method (17, 30,31) which had low bias in terms of performance bias. In terms of sample dropout bias, in 3 studies participants were present from the time of randomization to the time of analysis of the results (29, 33-34) and in 3 studies the number and cause of dropout of research units were reported (30,31, 17). Therefore, these studies were evaluated to have low bias in terms of the dropout bias. Review of reporting bias indicated that all 6 published articles apparently contained all the expected consequences, so they were considered to have no bias. A summary of the risk of bias for each study was provided in Figures 2 and 3.
Discussion
The present review was systematically evaluated and summarized the findings of clinical trials on the effect of Achillea millefolium on primary dysmenorrhea. The results of this review showed the effectiveness of Achillea millefolium in reduction of menstrual bleeding volume and dysmenorrhea. Achillea millefolium has analgesic properties with derivatives of salicylic acid, orgenol, and menthol (38-39). In two studies, the same dose and duration of treatment were used to reduce menstrual pain (17,29), but in another study (33), the research
units received tea bags with 4g of dried Achillea millefolium powder (one tea bag in 300 ml warm water per cup) in the first three days of menstruation for two consecutive months for 3 days per month, and its dose and consumption was different in the two studies (17,29), but the results of the three studies were the same(17,29,33). In the study by Maleki-Dizaji et al. (2019), both groups randomly received Achillea millefolium capsule (1000 mg) or mefenamic acid capsule (250 mg) and in the third cycle of treatments. Pain intensity was then measured every one, two, three, and six hours. Compared with placebo, mefenamic acid and Achillea millefolium significantly reduced pain scores, but pain relief was greater in Achillea millefolium group (34). In their study, the severity of menstrual pain was investigated during three cycles (34), which is in line with the findings reported by previous studies (17,29,33). The measurement tool in all 4 studies was VAS (17,29,33-34).
The flavonoids in Achillea millefolium regulated arachidonic acid metabolism. This plant can be used as an antiprostaglandin drug in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea by inhibiting the enzyme cyclooxygenase (40-41).
The results of the present study showed the effectiveness of Achillea millefolium in reduction of menstrual bleeding. This plant affects the smooth muscles of the uterus and increases its contraction and reduces bleeding, and is used orally in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding or uterine bleeding (42). In the study by Ebrahimi Varzaneh et al., Achillea millefolium had no significant effect on reducing the duration of menstrual bleeding but was effective in reducing menstrual bleeding volume, although the amount and duration of menstrual bleeding in the first period after treatment increased compared to the two intervention periods, but it was significantly less than the pre-treatment period. In their study, 150 mg capsules of Achillea millefolium extract and 500 mg capsules of mefenamic acid were taken every 8 hours for 7 days during menstrual bleeding for two consecutive months by the intervention group (31). In another study, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the mean bleeding volume before treatment and the first period after treatment, but there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean bleeding volume in the second period after treatment. The rate of bleeding was less than the control group. In their study, 2 capsules of 2.5 mg Achillea millefolium (4 capsules per day as 920 mg of Achillea millefolium extract or 10 grams of Achillea millefolium) were used every 12 hours and 2 capsules of 250 mg mefenamic acid (6 capsules per day) were used every 8 hours from the first day to the last day of menstruation for a maximum of 7 days and 2 cycles (30). In the other study, menstrual bleeding , symptoms of dysmenorrhea, duration of bleeding, and pain in the Achillea millefolium -treated group were lower than in mefenamic acid group. Despite the difference in dose and method of herbal medicine, Achillea millefolium was effective on menstrual bleeding (34).
The quality of the studies in this systematic review was assessed using Cochrane Risk of bias tool and the results showed that most studies had a suitable methodology. Since there are differences in the type and amount of essential oils, differences in the method of using Achillea millefolium, differences in the time of intervention and pain measurement time and also the limited studies and low sample size, further studies are needed to better identify the effect of Achillea millefolium on dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia.
Conclusion
The present systematic review of six studies suggests that Achillea millefolium can be considered an effective and safe treatment for primary dysmenorrhea and reduction of menstrual bleeding. However, It is advised that additional studies be conducted to provide robust scientific evidence for identifying the impact of Achillea millefolium on dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia.
Acknowledgements
The current study is derived from a research project approved by the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Student Research Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, mashhad, Iran.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.