Challenges and Strategies of Prenatal Care in Deaf Pregnant Women from the Perspective of Iranian Midwives: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 a) Assistant Professor, Reproductive Health Promotion Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran b) Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

2 a) PhD Student in Midwifery, Student Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur, Ahvaz, Iran b) Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22038/jmrh.2024.79673.2387

Abstract

Background & aim: Deaf pregnant women are one of the most vulnerable groups in any society. Midwives, as the members of the healthcare providers’ team, face various problems while providing services including prenatal care to deaf pregnant women. To gain midwives’ perspectives in this regard, this study conducted to explore the challenges and strategies of midwives in providing prenatal care to deaf and hard-of-hearing pregnant women.
Methods: This study was conducted using a qualitative content analysis from September 2023 to December 2023 in Khuzestan Province (Southwestern Iran). Purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 midwives with experience of providing prenatal care to deaf pregnant women. Data collection continued until data saturation. The analysis was done using the conventional content analysis method of Granheim and Lundman (2017). 
Results: Two main categories of “encountered challenges”, and “proposed strategies” emerged. The main category of encountered challenges included two subcategories of "midwives' feelings of weakness" and "midwives' psychological burden". The main category of proposed strategies also included two categories of "comprehensive support" and "specific instruction".
Conclusion: As a key element in providing services to deaf pregnant women, midwives face a range of challenges.  The current results can draw the attention of health managers to the challenges of midwives and other healthcare providers. Also, the strategies suggested by midwives can help managers to plan improved care provision to deaf pregnant women.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. WHO. Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss. Available from: https://www. who. int/publications/i/item/addressing-the-rising-prevalence-of-hearing-loss. 2018.
  2. Gooday G, Sayer K. Managing the experience of hearing loss in Britain, 1830-1930. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017.
  3. Deafness and hearing loss. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: (Fact sheet; https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss aM.
  4. Moradi G, Mostafavi F, Hajizadeh M, Amerzade M, Bolbanabad AM, Alinia C, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in different types of disabilities in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2018; 47(3): 427.
  5. Gichane MW, Heap M, Fontes M, London L. They must understand we are people: Pregnancy and maternity service use among signing Deaf women in Cape Town. Disability and Health Journal. 2017; 10(3): 434-439.
  6. Adigun OT, Mngomezulu TP. ‘They Forget I’m Deaf’: Exploring the Experience and Perception of Deaf Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics/Care. Annals of Global Health. 2020; 86(1): 96.
  7. Frier A, Barnett F, Devine S, Barker R. Understanding disability and the ‘social determinants of health’: how does disability affect peoples’ social determinants of health?. Disability and rehabilitation. 2018; 40(5): 538-547.
  8. Williamson HJ, Contreras GM, Rodriguez ES, Smith JM, Perkins EA. Health care access for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A scoping review. Occupation, Participation and Health. 2017; 37(4): 227-236.
  9. Arulogun OS, Titiloye MA, Desmenu A. Barriers faced by service providers in meeting the sexual and reproductive health needs of deaf persons in Ibadan metropolis: a qualitative study. The Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013; 4(11): 433-438.
  10. Adigun OT, Akinrinoye O, Obilor HN. Including the excluded in antenatal care: A systematic review of concerns for D/deaf pregnant women. Behavioral Sciences. 2021; 11(5): 67.
  11. Haricharan HJ, Hacking D, Lau YK, Heap M. Improving Knowledge About Pregnancy for Deaf South African Women of Reproductive Age Through a Text Messaging–Based Information Campaign: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting. 2023; 6(1): e40561.
  12. Madula P, Kalembo FW, Yu H, Kaminga AC. Healthcare provider-patient communication: a qualitative study of women’s perceptions during childbirth. Reproductive Health. 2018; 15(1): 1-10.
  13. Hubbard LJ, D’Andrea E, Carman LA. Promoting best practice for perinatal care of deaf women. Nursing for Women's Health. 2018; 22(2): 126-136.
  14. Mazurkiewicz B, Stefaniak M, Dmoch-Gajzlerska E. Perinatal care needs and expectations of women with low vision or total blindness in Warsaw, Poland. Disability and Health Journal. 2018; 11(4): 618-623.
  15. Steinberg AG, Wiggins EA, Barmada CH, Sullivan VJ. Deaf women: experiences and perceptions of healthcare system access. Journal of Women's Health. 2002; 11(8): 729-741.
  16. Arsenault C, Jordan K, Lee D, Dinsa G, Manzi F, Marchant T, et al. Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of 91 national household surveys. The Lancet Global Health. 2018; 6(11): e1186-e1195.
  17. Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, Ekholuenetale M, Bishwajit G. Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in Benin: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 1-9.
  18. Tisdell EJ, Merriam SB, Stuckey-Peyrot HL. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons; 2025.
  19. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2015; 42: 533-544.
  20. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007; 19(6): 349-357.
  21. Graneheim UH, Lindgren B-M, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today. 2017; 56: 29-34.
  22. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation. 1986; 1986(30): 73-84.
  23. Muasya G, Kusina L. Communication: Key to Improving Maternal Health in Sub Saharan Africa. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research. 2020; 5(1).
  24. De Andrade Costa A, Vogt SE, Ruas EdFG, Holzmann APF, da Silva PLN. Welcome and listen to the silence: nursing care from the perspective of deaf woman during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum/Acolher e escutar o silêncio: o cuidado de enfermagem sob a ótica da mulher surda durante a gestação, parto e puerpério. Revista de Pesquisa Cuidado é Fundamental Online. 2018; 10(1): 123-129.
  25. Panko TL, Cuculick J, Albert S, Smith LD, Cooley MM, Herschel M, et al. Experiences of pregnancy and perinatal healthcare access of women who are deaf: a qualitative study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2023; 130(5): 514-521.
  26. Mitra M, McKee MM, Akobirshoev I, Valentine A, Ritter G, Zhang J, et al. Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes among women who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020; 58(3): 418-426.
  27. Helm KV, Panko TL, Herschel M, Smith LD, Mitra M, McKee MM. Maternal Health Experiences of Black Deaf and Hard of Hearing Women in the United States. Women's Health Issues. 2023; 33(6): 610-617.
  28. Begley C, Higgins A, Lalor J, Sheerin F, Alexander J, Nicholl H, et al. The strengths and weaknesses of publicly-funded Irish health services provided to women with disabilities in relation to pregnancy, childbirth and early motherhood. National Disability Authority. 2010.
  29. Jackson M. Deafness and antenatal care: Understanding issues with access. British Journal of Midwifery. 2011; 19(5): 280-284.
  30. Kelsall J. Hearing impairment and midwifery care. Challenges in Midwifery Care. 1997: 76-86.
  31. Olivia BB, Fiona A, Mary A. Perceptions of midwifery students and their lecturers regarding challenges faced by deaf pregnant women in accessing maternity care. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2023; 27(9): 43-56.
  32. Equy V, Derore A, Vassort N, Branchet F, Mongourdin B. Evaluation of Measures to Facilitate Access to Care for Pregnant Deaf Patients: Use of Interpreters and Training of Caregivers in Sign Language. Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids. 2013; 1: 103.
  33. Kim EJ, Byrne B, Parish SL. Deaf people and economic well-being: findings from the Life Opportunities Survey. Disability & Society. 2018; 33(3): 374-391.
  34. Mheta D, Sibiya MN, Nkosi PB. Experiences of women with disabilities in accessing maternal healthcare services: a South African case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(21): 6966.
  35. Casebolt MT. Barriers to reproductive health services for women with disability in low-and middle-income countries: a review of the literature. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2020; 24: 100485.
  36. Mitra M, Akobirshoev I, Moring NS, Long-Bellil L, Smeltzer SC, Smith LD, et al. Access to and satisfaction with prenatal care among pregnant women with physical disabilities: findings from a national survey. Journal of Women's Health. 2017; 26(12): 1356-1363.
  37. Luton M, Allan HT, Kaur H. Deaf women’s experiences of maternity and primary care: An integrative review. Midwifery. 2022; 104: 103190.
  38. Santoso AJ. Mobile application design emergency medical call for the deaf using UCD method. iJIM International Journal: Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2018; 12(3): 168-177.
Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health
Volume 14, Issue 1
January 2026
Pages 5214-5225

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics