1. Kuppermann M, Kaimal AJ, Blat C, Gonzalez J, Thiet M-P, Bermingham Y, et al. Effect of a patient-centered decision support tool on rates of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery: the PROCEED randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2020; 323(21): 2151-2159.
2. Koppes DM, van Hees MS, Koenders VM, Oudijk MA, Bekker MN, Franssen MT, et al. Nationwide implementation of a decision aid on vaginal birth after cesarean: a before and after cohort study. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2021; 49(7): 783-790.
3. Hoseini Haji SZ, Firoozi M, Asghari Pour N, Shakeri MT. Impact of motivational interviewing on women's knowledge, attitude and intention to choose vaginal birth after caesarean section: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2020; 8(1): 2115-2125.
4. Lundgren I, Morano S, Nilsson C, Sinclair M, Begley C. Cultural perspectives on vaginal birth after previous caesarean section in countries with high and low rates—A hermeneutic study. Women and Birth. 2020; 33(4): e339-e347.
5. Uno K, Mayama M, Yoshihara M, Takeda T, Tano S, Suzuki T, et al. Reasons for previous Cesarean deliveries impact a woman’s independent decision of delivery mode and the success of trial of labor after Cesarean. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020; 20(1): 1-8.
6. Firoozi M, Tara F, Ahanchian MR, Roudsari RL. Health care system barriers to vaginal birth after cesarean section: a qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2020; 25(3): 202.
7. Tucker Edmonds B, Hoffman SM, Laitano T, McKenzie F, Panoch J, Litwiller A, et al. Evaluating shared decision making in trial of labor after cesarean counseling using objective structured clinical examinations. Mededportal. 2020; 16: 10891.
8. Chu J, Keedle H, Sutcliffe K, Blumenthal N, Levett K. The outcomes for women planning a VBAC at a private hospital in Australia. Birth. 2024.
9. Kalburgi P, Patil S. Maternal and Fetal Outcome in Patients with Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Delivery Comparison to and Elective Caesarean Section with Previous One LSCS. National Journal of Medical Research. 2024; 14(01): 29-34.
10. Black M, Entwistle VA, Bhattacharya S, Gillies K. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1): e008881.
11. Chen S-W, Hutchinson AM, Nagle C, Bucknall TK. Women’s decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 1-13.
12. Cron J, Shapiro AA, Carasimu L, Iyasere J, Schisler JM, Nagy S, et al. Understanding Clinician Knowledge About Race Adjustment in the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculator. Health Equity. 2024; 8(1): 3-7.
13. Vandenberghe G, Vercoutere A, Cuvellier N, Van Oost E, Leroy C, Goemaes R, et al. Influence of organizational factors on the offer and success rate of a trial of labor after cesarean section in Belgium: an ecological study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 684.
14. Hadizadeh-Talasaz F, Ghoreyshi F, Mohammadzadeh F, Rahmani R. Effect of shared decision making on mode of delivery and decisional conflict and regret in pregnant women with previous cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021; 21(1): 1-10.
15. Chinkam S, Steer-Massaro C, Damus K, Shorten B, Shorten A. A shared decision-making toolkit for mode of birth after cesarean. The Journal of Perinatal Education. 2020; 29(1): 35-49.
16. Andaroon N, Kordi M, Kimiaee SA, Esmaeili H. The effect of individual counseling on attitudes and decisional conflict in the choice of delivery among nulliparous women. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2020; 9.
17. Jourabchi Z, Roshan Z, Alipour M, Ranjkesh F. Effect of group counseling on the type of delivery in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care. 2018; 26(2): 120-128.
18. Ugwumadu A. Does the maxim “once a caesarean, always a caesarean” still hold? PLoS Medicine. 2005; 2(9): e305.
19. Hemminki E, Long Q, Zhang W-H, Wu Z, Raven J, Tao F, et al. Impact of financial and educational interventions on maternity care: results of cluster randomized trials in rural China, CHIMACA. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2013; 17(2): 208-221.
20. Attarian S, Feyzi Z, Jamali J, Firoozi M. The effect of motivation and ability to choose delivery type on labor self-efficacy in women with previous cesarean section. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2022; 25(2): 44-51.
21. Attarian S, Feyzi Z, Jamali J, Firoozi M. The effect of individual counseling based on the Fogg model on the motivation and fear of natural childbirth in women with previous cesarean section. Hayat. 2022: 259-271.
22. Walton GM, Cohen GL. A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science. 2011; 331(6023): 1447-1451.
23. McCambridge J, Saitz R. Rethinking brief interventions for alcohol in general practice. Bmj. 2017; 356.
24. Fogg BJ, editor. A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology; 2009: ACM.
25. Fogg BJ. Tiny habits: The small changes that change everything: Eamon Dolan Books; 2019.
26. Firoozi M, Tara F, Mazloum SR, Latifnejad Roudsari R. A qualitative inquiry to explore why women with previous cesarean section do not choose vaginal birth after cesarean. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2021; 9(2): 2753-2762.
27. Javaheri F, Hashemikhah Z. Voluntary cesarean: the study on female existential experiences based on a sample from Tehran. Women's Strategic Studies. 2016; 18(71 (spring 2016)): 7-28.
28. Rahnama P, Mohammadi K, Montazeri A. Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran. Reproductive Health. 2015; 13(1): 1-8.
29. Maleki M, Shams M, Mousavizadeh A, Parhizkar S, Angha P. Development of a tailored intervention to promote normal vaginal delivery among primigravida women: a formative study. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 45(6): 886-892.
30. Abbaspoor Z, Moghaddam-Banaem L, Ahmadi F, Kazemnejad Lili A. Postnatal sexual concerns regarding the selection of delivery mode among Iranian women: a qualitative content analysis. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2016; 4(2): 613-621.
31. Najafi-Sharjabad F, Keshavarz P, Moradian Z. Survey on the prevalence and influencing factors for choosing normal vaginal delivery among pregnant women in Bushehr city, 2015. Community Health Journal. 2018; 11(1): 20-29.
32. Hoseini Haji SZ, Firoozi M. Shared decision-making about birth after cesarean: Review study. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2020; 23(4): 89-97.
33. Ridley RT, Davis PA, Bright JH, Sinclair D. What influences a woman to choose vaginal birth after cesarean? Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2002; 31(6): 665-672.
34. Darmian ME, Yousefzadeh S, Najafi TF, Javadi SV. Comparative study of teaching natural delivery benefits and optimism training on mothers’ attitude and intention to select a type of delivery: an educational experiment. Electronic Physician. 2018; 10(7): 7038.
35. Chinkam S, Ewan J, Koeniger‐Donohue R, Hawkins JW, Shorten A. The effect of evidence‐based scripted midwifery counseling on women's choices about mode of birth after a previous cesarean. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2016; 61(5): 613-620.